Text Us!

Recent Medical Malpractice Cases in South and North Carolina

Posted on

A negative outcome from a medical procedure doesn’t necessarily constitute medical malpractice, but it is a possibility. Physicians who breach their duty to provide the required standard of care, who make a preventable error, or who lack the training needed to provide the necessary treatment could be found negligent. Physician negligence and hospital malpractice are complex and difficult to prove, which is why contacting a skilled medical malpractice attorney is important.

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Chester South Carolina
Not sure if you should file a medical malpractice lawsuit? Contact Elrod Pope Law Firm today!

Recent Medical Malpractice Cases in South Carolina and North Carolina

To understand what a successful medical malpractice claim looks like, here are a couple of recent notable lawsuits in South Carolina and North Carolina.

A Columbia, SC, doctor was hit with a medical malpractice judgment of $10 million after Joann Bannister passed away due to delays in receiving life-saving cancer treatment. The verdict was entered against Columbia Urological Associates and Dr. Philip Kinder. Kinder was treating Mrs. Bannister for a growth on her kidney that kept increasing in size. Radiology suggested follow-up to rule out underlying malignancy, but Kinder failed to communicate that to the patient. By the time she went in for the next scan, the radiologist reported that the growth was malignant, but had aggressively spread to other areas of her body. She died five months later. Kinder initially offered $250,000, which was rejected, and the resulting jury trial resulted in the multi-million-dollar verdict.

A pending case in North Carolina alleges a former physician at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center inserted a birth-control device in a patient without her knowledge. The lawsuit seeks damages of more than $10 million. The doctor is denying the allegations, and the hospital and doctor have filed for a motion to dismiss the case. The lawsuit alleges the patient was seeking treatment for uterine fibroids in 2007, and discovered the device five years later when she was unable to get pregnant. She required surgery after the birth control device split into two parts, and now claims she has to undergo a hysterectomy. The doctor claims it was an IUD designed to keep scar tissue from reforming and preventing infertility.  

Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations

Like other personal injury claims, there is a statute of limitations on a medical negligence claim. The statute of limitations is generally three years against private defendants and two years for government agencies. The clock begins to tick when the negligence is discovered, which may not be an immediate discovery. In some instances, people may not realize there was an issue until years later.  

When Do You Need a Medical Malpractice Attorney?

Medical malpractice claims aren’t necessarily as obvious as the situation in the Kinder case. If you received medical treatment that you suspect was negligent, or if a loved one died at the hands of a physician or medical provider which could’ve been avoided, you need to speak with a qualified medical malpractice attorney. Contact our team at Elrod Pope Law Firm and schedule a consultation. One of our skilled lawyers can walk through the specifics of your situation and determine whether you have a potential medical malpractice claim.

Get in touch with us today to get started with your FREE case review. We’re only a call, click, or short drive away.

*Disclaimer* The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

Some links within the Website may lead to other web-sites, including those operated and maintained by third parties. The Firm includes these links solely as a convenience to you, and the presence of such a link does not imply a responsibility for the linked site or an endorsement of the linked site, its operator, or its contents.

This Website and its contents are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Furthermore, The Firm does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this Website in a state where this Website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

E-production, distribution, republication, and/or retransmission of material contained within The Firm Website is prohibited unless the prior written permission of The Firm has been obtained.

Any results achieved on behalf of one client do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Fee Disclosure: If your case is taken on by the firm, the fee arrangement will be a percentage of the final value of the case as follows: up to 40% for litigation, 35% for pre-litigation, and 33% for workers comp. This calculation will be done before the deduction of expenses. Additionally, the client will be responsible for the expenses resulting from the case.