Text Us!

Could Adrian Peterson be Sued in Civil Court?

Posted on

On September 12, 2014, Minnesota Vikings running back and former NFL MVP Adrian Peterson was indicted on charges of reckless or negligent injury to a child.  The charges concern Peterson’s four-year-old son, whom he spanked with a switch.  Peterson has claimed that he never intended to harm his son, and that the discipline was similar to what he received as a child.  While a national debate has sprung up concerning child abuse, with celebrities including Charles Barkley and D.L. Hughely defending Peterson, he awaits an October 8 court date and charges that could result in up to two years of jail time and a $10,000 fine.  Those are the criminal charges facing Peterson.  But would his son be able to sue him in civil court for monetary damages as well?

For a long time, most states did not allow children to sue their parents for any reason.  In 1891, a daughter tried to sue her mother for wrongfully committing her to an insane asylum.  The Supreme Court of Mississippi threw out her case, finding that the very “peace of society, and of families composing society” depended on children not being permitted to sue their parents!  Tennessee made a similar ruling a few years later, quoting the language from the Mississippi case.  In 1905, the State of Washington dismissed the case of a daughter who was suing her father for raping her.

Most other states followed Mississippi’s example, and parent-child suits were banned in almost every state in the Union, including South Carolina.  One commentator went so far as to say that parent-child suits were “abhorrent to the idea of family discipline which all nations, rude or civilized, have so steadily inculcated.”  At about the same time, most states also forbid wives from suing their husbands for assault.  The Maine Supreme Court found that the injured woman had “remedy enough” in the criminal courts, and could even, “as a last resort,” prosecute a suit for divorce.

Things began to change in the 1950’s.  The courts began to allow suits in special circumstances, or when the parent’s conduct was so reckless or malicious that they could be found to have “abandoned the parental relationship.”  Most of these cases focused on reckless or drunk driving, although the Maryland Supreme Court allowed a child to sue his father for mental distress after the father murdered the child’s mother.

These exceptions were only the beginning of a growing trend, and in 1980 South Carolina passed a statute permitting children to sue their parents for all injuries, no matter whether the parent was acting intentionally, recklessly, or only negligently.  The South Carolina Supreme Court upheld this law, saying that the “family harmony” reasoning of the Mississippi Court was now almost “universally condemned.”  A handful of holdouts remain, but the vast majority of states have now abolished parental immunity and allow children to sue parents for personal injuries.  Unfortunately for Adrian Peterson, the State of Texas—where his two sons live—is one of the states that allows these suits.

What do you think?  Should children be allowed to sue their parents in situations like this, or should parents have the right to discipline their children as they see fit?  Are there any situations in which children should have the right to sue their parents?  Let us know your thoughts on Facebook or Twitter.

Get in touch with us today to get started with your FREE case review. We’re only a call, click, or short drive away.

*Disclaimer* The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

Some links within the Website may lead to other web-sites, including those operated and maintained by third parties. The Firm includes these links solely as a convenience to you, and the presence of such a link does not imply a responsibility for the linked site or an endorsement of the linked site, its operator, or its contents.

This Website and its contents are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Furthermore, The Firm does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this Website in a state where this Website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

E-production, distribution, republication, and/or retransmission of material contained within The Firm Website is prohibited unless the prior written permission of The Firm has been obtained.

Any results achieved on behalf of one client do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Fee Disclosure: If your case is taken on by the firm, the fee arrangement will be a percentage of the final value of the case as follows: up to 40% for litigation, 35% for pre-litigation, and 33% for workers comp. This calculation will be done before the deduction of expenses. Additionally, the client will be responsible for the expenses resulting from the case.