Text Us!

Liability Issues in Uber/Ridesharing Claims

Posted on

In just a few short years, Uber has expanded to almost forty million rides per month in the United States alone. A significant number of these drivers over-rely on GPS navigation and other devices, so they often have one eye on a gadget and one eye on the road.

If an Uber or other rideshare driver causes a crash, a Rock Hill personal injury attorney could obtain substantial compensation for victims. That compensation usually includes money for economic losses, including medical bills, and noneconomic losses, including pain and suffering. Additional punitive damages might also be available, in some cases if the driver was reckless.

Duty of Care in Commercial Driver Claims

Negligence cases usually begin with a legal duty. If a person breaches a duty of care and causes injury, that person is liable for damages.

Most non-commercial drivers have a duty of reasonable care. They must drive defensively and obey the rules of the road. 

However, ridesharing drivers, bus drivers, taxi drivers, and other drivers who transport people or cargo for a fee are common carriers. Since these individuals are professional drivers, they may have a higher duty of care under the law.

So, ridesharing operators must be extra careful. Distracted driving, which was mentioned above, is a good example. 

Third-Party Liability

South Carolina has one of the lowest auto insurance requirements in the country. So, in a catastrophic injury wreck, the tortfeasor (negligent driver) might not have enough insurance coverage to provide fair compensation.

Fortunately, South Carolina also has some of the broadest vicarious liability laws in the country. In other words, in many cases, the negligent driver is not the only party responsible for damages.

Respondeat superior (“let the master answer”) is a good example. This legal doctrine holds ridesharing companies and other such companies liable for the negligent acts of their drivers. Respondeat superior has two major prongs:

  • Employee: If the company controls the driver, perhaps in terms of the route traveled or riders picked up, that person is normally an employee for negligence purposes, even if the driver is technically an independent contractor.
  • Scope of Employment: Similarly, any act which benefits the employer in any way is within the scope of employment. That includes something like driving an empty car to a pickup point.

Other employer liability theories, which often come up in nursing home abuse and other intentional tort claims, include negligent hiring and negligent entrustment.

Uber crashes are legally complex. For a free consultation with an experienced Rock Hill uber accident attorney, contact The Elrod Pope Law Firm, P.A. Home and hospital visits are available.

Get in touch with us today to get started with your FREE case review. We’re only a call, click, or short drive away.

*Disclaimer* The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

Some links within the Website may lead to other web-sites, including those operated and maintained by third parties. The Firm includes these links solely as a convenience to you, and the presence of such a link does not imply a responsibility for the linked site or an endorsement of the linked site, its operator, or its contents.

This Website and its contents are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Furthermore, The Firm does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this Website in a state where this Website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

E-production, distribution, republication, and/or retransmission of material contained within The Firm Website is prohibited unless the prior written permission of The Firm has been obtained.

Any results achieved on behalf of one client do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Fee Disclosure: If your case is taken on by the firm, the fee arrangement will be a percentage of the final value of the case as follows: up to 40% for litigation, 35% for pre-litigation, and 33% for workers comp. This calculation will be done before the deduction of expenses. Additionally, the client will be responsible for the expenses resulting from the case.