Text Us!

Distracted Drivers v. Smart Phones: Who’s Liable?

Posted on

On April 22nd, we wrote about how many motorists still text and drive even when they know the risks.  Cell phones are an incredible distraction, but since the ban on driving and texting in South Carolina took effect in December 2014, only around 2,000 tickets have been written for the offense.  According to the South Carolina Department of Transportation, fatalities from distracted driving were at an all-time high in 2015 with 64 deaths.  In fact, motor vehicle accident fatalities nationwide are at their highest point in the last fifty years, and cell phones are being blamed for this epidemic.

Most people would assume that a distracted driver who injures another would be the only liable party in a lawsuit.  However, in the past couple of years, some people have begun trying to sue smartphone manufacturers as well.

Lawsuits and Smart Phones: Texting while Driving

Since 2016, there have been numerous lawsuits throughout the country brought against Apple, Samsung, and other manufacturers.  Their argument is simple: public safety should be valued over profits.  Smartphone makers have technology that would automatically lock cell phones in automobiles once the smartphone detects the automobile traveling at a certain speed.  Victims’ families want to know why this technology is not in use.

Indeed, one lawsuit in California brought Apple to the forefront.  Apple has a patent for “a handheld computing device [that] can provide a lock-out mechanism without requiring any modifications or additions to a vehicle by using a motion analyzer, a scenery analyzer and a lock-out mechanism.”  The plaintiff in that case argued that the use of this technology could save thousands of lives throughout the United States, in addition to hundreds of thousands of injuries.

Lawsuits and Smart Phones: Applications

Texting isn’t the only distraction that causes accidents.  Apps can too.  In another recent lawsuit against Apple, a family sued over a fatal car crash in Texas on Christmas Eve.  In this wreck, the at-fault driver was distracted by using FaceTime, and hit a stopped car at 65 miles per hour, resulting in the death of a five-year-old girl.  The same argument above is being used in this case: Apple’s failure to introduce technology that would have locked the phone or iPad while the automobile was traveling at a certain speed would have prevented the wreck.

The Problem: Proximity

To win a lawsuit for damages, you must prove proximate, or direct and foreseeable, cause.  In most cases so far, the courts have concluded that there is not a sufficient causal link between Apple’s decision not to implement their lock-out technology and the wreck itself.  The proximate cause begins and ends with the distracted driver’s bad conduct.

There is a legal duty of care among drivers to drive carefully and to cause no harm to other drivers or passengers on the road.  That duty is breached when the person uses smart phone technology and becomes distracted, and that misuse is the proximate cause of any resulting wreck.

The Technology: Why Not Implement It

Apple has not yet implemented lockout technology because it is impossible to distinguish the user of the phone, and not just the speed of the vehicle.  The current technology would lock out all cell phones in any moving vehicle—not just the driver’s, but all passengers’ as well.  That is not a technology that consumers would want, and would be a significant inconvenience to most customers.

What can be done to reduce driver distractions with cell phones?

As a responsible driver, you might look into applications that can help you avoid from the distractions associated with smart phones.  There are apps now available that can be used to lock out phones, including Canary, DriveScribe, Textbuster, DriveMode, and DriveOff.  There’s also an application called Control the Distraction Life 360 that has a feature that allows users to review how fast members of their family are driving and whether they are touching the screen or not.  This is particularly helpful for parents who want to check on their teenagers.

Car Accident Attorneys in South Carolina

What should you do if you are in a South Carolina car accident where the other driver was distracted while texting and driving, or using an application while driving?

Don’t sue Apple.  Instead, contact Elrod Pope Law Firm.  Our dedicated car accident lawyers in Chester, SC have the experience and knowledge to investigate distracted driving accidents. We fight aggressively on your behalf.  Call today to ask questions and to discuss the unique details of your particular case.

Get in touch with us today to get started with your FREE case review. We’re only a call, click, or short drive away.

*Disclaimer* The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

Some links within the Website may lead to other web-sites, including those operated and maintained by third parties. The Firm includes these links solely as a convenience to you, and the presence of such a link does not imply a responsibility for the linked site or an endorsement of the linked site, its operator, or its contents.

This Website and its contents are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Furthermore, The Firm does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this Website in a state where this Website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

E-production, distribution, republication, and/or retransmission of material contained within The Firm Website is prohibited unless the prior written permission of The Firm has been obtained.

Any results achieved on behalf of one client do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Fee Disclosure: If your case is taken on by the firm, the fee arrangement will be a percentage of the final value of the case as follows: up to 40% for litigation, 35% for pre-litigation, and 33% for workers comp. This calculation will be done before the deduction of expenses. Additionally, the client will be responsible for the expenses resulting from the case.