Text Us!

The Battle of the Experts in Medical Malpractice Law

Posted on

A recently filed lawsuit in South Carolina sheds light on the severity of medical malpractice in our state. A two-year-old died after suffering a severe seizure. His mother is convinced, based on medical records, that the laboratory who tested his blood for a genetic mutation did not do so accurately. The lab is accused of misclassifying the child’s mutation, meaning that the lab did not feel there was enough evidence to link the mutation to his epilepsy. The outcome of this case will rely heavily on medical expert witnesses. Each side is expected to bring their own expert in order to prove the veracity of their claims.


My Expert Is Better Than Your Expert


Often times in medical malpractice cases the decision on liability comes down to which expert the jury believes. If you are the victim, then you are the plaintiff. You are required to prove your case by a preponderance of the evidence. This includes bringing forth a well-respected expert witness in the field of medicine that is involved in the case. For example, if the case involves heart problems, it is not wise to bring a foot doctor to be your expert. You would need a good cardiologist who is well respected and is able to testify as to the nature of the malpractice. Rest assured, that the defendant will also bring their own expert witness who will most likely contradict your expert witnesses testimony. The question then is left for the jury to decide. This is often called the “battle of the experts.” Navigating this battle of medical testimony takes the skill of experienced malpractice attorneys.


The Scientific Literature


Another way that juries distinguish between expert witnesses is by looking at the literature in the scientific community at the time. Often times expert witnesses have published scientific articles or journals have had those articles or journals peer-reviewed. Medical malpractice cases often get bogged down in the science. This is understandable if you look at it from the outside point of view, where a jury who does not know you have to make a decision based on facts.


However, at Elrod Pope Law Firm, we understand the emotional, physical and psychological impact of medical malpractice injuries. We know you are more than simply statistics on a scientific report. Our experienced Rock Hill, SC medical malpractice lawyers are very qualified and able to navigate this often tricky and technical science-based case. If you are a loved one has been the victim of medical malpractice, please contact our law firm immediately. We are here to help you!

Get in touch with us today to get started with your FREE case review. We’re only a call, click, or short drive away.

*Disclaimer* The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm, nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.

Some links within the Website may lead to other web-sites, including those operated and maintained by third parties. The Firm includes these links solely as a convenience to you, and the presence of such a link does not imply a responsibility for the linked site or an endorsement of the linked site, its operator, or its contents.

This Website and its contents are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.

Furthermore, The Firm does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this Website in a state where this Website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

E-production, distribution, republication, and/or retransmission of material contained within The Firm Website is prohibited unless the prior written permission of The Firm has been obtained.

Any results achieved on behalf of one client do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Fee Disclosure: If your case is taken on by the firm, the fee arrangement will be a percentage of the final value of the case as follows: up to 40% for litigation, 35% for pre-litigation, and 33% for workers comp. This calculation will be done before the deduction of expenses. Additionally, the client will be responsible for the expenses resulting from the case.